Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25648422-20150719094621

We all know that all users who are promoted were promoted due to a discussion with the members of the staff. They first talk about a certain user and then decide when to promote him/her.

If a user is promoted because that's what the members of the staff think. But how about what the rest of the wiki community thinks?

Several weeks ago, Arkaine made three templates: namely the Support, Oppose, and Neautral. These templates are mainly used for voting during a particularly important discussion. By the words themselves, Support means aggreeing, Oppose means disagreeing, but Neutral means undecided or you are not quite sure. These templates are very good to use actually. Other wikis, especially the ones with major communities have these templates that they use for discussions that requires voting. Aside from just using these templates, they also place reasons, particularly extrememly valid ones.

So everyone, what do you all think of this suggestion? This does not just also apply in promotion of users, but also in demotion of users, and as well voting for particular changes that need to be made in the wiki. If we get to see what the staff thinks, what about what the rest of the wiki community thinks? 